10c11e9bf4d66861
DOW-UAP-D50-Email-Correspondence-INDOPACOM-April-2025.pdf
DOD·DOW_Transparency_Release·pdf·305 KB·2 pages
Scores
3.4
Document value
0.0
Cross-references
6.0
Provenance
3.1
Info density
5.0
Topic relevance
0.0
Anomalousness
Events this document cites (1)
OCR'd text preview (2 of 2 pages)
Source: embedded
page 0
I just got off the phone with the unit that flies They said to me (b) (6) 1.4(a) that the two lines listed are on the UNCLASSIFIED level and that adding in the AOR as INDOPACOM is also at the UNCLASSIFIED level. (b) (6) PAROC Intel Data Analysis Technician Team Lead 12 AF / DET 3 (b) (6) 1.4(a) (b) (6) CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN Hello, Per our conversaƟon, can you please confirm that the tearlines below are at the UNCLASSIFIED level? Also, could you please confirm that we can use the AOR INDOPACOM. Thank you…
page 1
(b) (6) CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN (b) (6) CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN Hello, I wanted to clarify that these tearlines are approved at the UNCLASSIFIED level. 1.4(a) on 10APR25 //UNCLASSIFIED// US AIRCRAFT OBSERVED 1X POSS UAP FOR 12 SECONDS AT 2353Z, FLYING AT UNK ALTITUDE AND UNK SPEED, NO INTERFERENCE WAS NOTED. //UNCLASSIFIED// on 11APR25 1.4(a) //UNCLASSIFIED// US AIRCRAFT OBSERVED 1X POSS UAP FOR 23 SECONDS AT 0007Z, FLYING AT UNK ALTITUDE AND UNK SPEED, NO INTERFERENCE WAS NOTED. //UNCLASSIFIED// …
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →