10c11e9bf4d66861

DOW-UAP-D50-Email-Correspondence-INDOPACOM-April-2025.pdf

DOD·DOW_Transparency_Release·pdf·305 KB·2 pages

Scores

3.4
Document value
0.0
Cross-references
6.0
Provenance
3.1
Info density
5.0
Topic relevance
0.0
Anomalousness

Events this document cites (1)

OCR'd text preview (2 of 2 pages)

Source: embedded

page 0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
I just got off the phone with the unit that flies 
They said to me 
(b) (6)
1.4(a)
that the two lines listed are on the UNCLASSIFIED level and that adding in 
the AOR as INDOPACOM is also at the UNCLASSIFIED level. 
(b) (6)
PAROC Intel Data Analysis Technician 
Team Lead 
12 AF / DET 3 
(b) (6)
1.4(a) 
(b) (6)
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN 
Hello, 
Per our conversaƟon, can you please confirm that the 
tearlines below 
are at the UNCLASSIFIED level? Also, could you please confirm that we can 
use the AOR INDOPACOM. 
Thank you
page 1
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
(b) (6)
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN 
(b) (6)
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN 
Hello, 
I wanted to clarify that these tearlines are approved at the UNCLASSIFIED 
level. 
1.4(a) 
on 10APR25 
//UNCLASSIFIED// 
US AIRCRAFT OBSERVED 1X POSS UAP FOR 12 SECONDS AT 2353Z, FLYING AT UNK 
ALTITUDE AND UNK SPEED, NO INTERFERENCE WAS NOTED. 
//UNCLASSIFIED// 
on 11APR25 
1.4(a) 
//UNCLASSIFIED// 
US AIRCRAFT OBSERVED 1X POSS UAP FOR 23 SECONDS AT 0007Z, FLYING AT UNK 
ALTITUDE AND UNK SPEED, NO INTERFERENCE WAS NOTED. 
//UNCLASSIFIED// 

Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →