1a0dac37be69919b
302531408.pdf
NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-5·pdf·3.3 MB·2 pages
OCR'd text preview (2 of 2 pages)
Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%
page 1
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD | 1. DATE 5 or 6 Jan 64 | 2. LOCATION Dayton, Ohio | | 12. CONCLUSIONS ☐ Was Balloon ☐ Probably Balloon ☐ Possibly Balloon ☐ Was Aircraft ☐ Probably Aircraft ☐ Possibly Aircraft ☐ Was Astronomical ☐ Probably Astronomical ☐ Possibly Astronomical ☐ Other ☑ Insufficient Data for Evaluation ☐ Unknown | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP Local CMT not reported | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ☑ Ground-Visual ☐ Ground-Redar ☐ Air-Visual ☐ Air-Intercept Redar | | | | 5. PHOTOS ☐ Yes ☑ No | 6. SOURCE civilian | | | | 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION not reported…
page 2
5-6 HEADQUARTERS FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO REPLY TO ATTN OF: TDX SUBJECT: Extract from Duty Officers Report 10 Jan 64 TO: TDEW The following, extracted from Maj Sullivan's OD Report dated 9 Jan 64, is quoted for your information: "A Mrs. [redacted] called about sighting an unidentified object earlier in the week - she said she would call back with pertinent facts but failed to do so - The objects were seen either Sunday or Monday night. She lives about 10 miles North of Dayton. She said objects were…
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →