1a0dac37be69919b

302531408.pdf

NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-5·pdf·3.3 MB·2 pages

OCR'd text preview (2 of 2 pages)

Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%

page 1
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD

|  1. DATE 5 or 6 Jan 64 | 2. LOCATION Dayton, Ohio |   | 12. CONCLUSIONS ☐ Was Balloon ☐ Probably Balloon ☐ Possibly Balloon ☐ Was Aircraft ☐ Probably Aircraft ☐ Possibly Aircraft ☐ Was Astronomical ☐ Probably Astronomical ☐ Possibly Astronomical ☐ Other ☑ Insufficient Data for Evaluation ☐ Unknown  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  3. DATE-TIME GROUP Local CMT not reported | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ☑ Ground-Visual ☐ Ground-Redar ☐ Air-Visual ☐ Air-Intercept Redar  |   |   |
|  5. PHOTOS ☐ Yes ☑ No | 6. SOURCE civilian  |   |   |
|  7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION not reported
page 2
5-6

HEADQUARTERS
FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO

REPLY TO
ATTN OF: TDX

SUBJECT: Extract from Duty Officers Report 10 Jan 64

TO: TDEW

The following, extracted from Maj Sullivan's OD Report dated 9 Jan 64, is quoted for your information:

"A Mrs. [redacted] called about sighting an unidentified object earlier in the week - she said she would call back with pertinent facts but failed to do so - The objects were seen either Sunday or Monday night. She lives about 10 miles North of Dayton. She said objects were

Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →