248a4b2dd752042b
CIA-RDP89B00569R000400050070-9.pdf
CIA·UFO_Collection·pdf·123 KB·3 pages
Scores
2.9
Document value
0.0
Cross-references
5.0
Provenance
2.8
Info density
4.0
Topic relevance
0.0
Anomalousness
OCR'd text preview (3 of 3 pages)
Source: tesseract · confidence ~82%
page 0
7 sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/23 : CIA- RDP89B00569R000400050070- S) CONF: BPD qa 225 32%,5266728,9512) INFO:$ fC (11) OHD 1. REF A, DETAILED BELOW ARE THE AMENDED LETTERS AND COORDINATES FOR THE TWO ROUTES WHICH HAVE/AEEN AGREED: ROUTE A (PRIORITY ONE) | A, POINTS A THRU G (INCLUSIVE) SAME AS REF A, B, DELETE LETTERS AND COORDINATES FROM PT H THRU PT S (INCLUSIVE) AND SUBSTITUTE FOLLOWING: 25X11 25 YEAR RE-REVIEW COORDINATING OFFICERS \ RELEASING OFFICER AUTHENTICATING OFFICER w Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 3009/12/23 CIA. RDP89B00569R000400050070- 9
page 1
25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/23 : CIA-RDP89B00569R000400050070-9 —& V4 rod Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/23 : CIA-RDP89B00569R000400050070-9
page 2
4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/12/23 : CIA-RDP89B00569R000400050070-9 CLASSIFIED. MESSAGE TOP SECRET WILL ASSUME THis PROFILE 8 ACCEPTABLE UNLESS you ADVISE 4 <0 THE CONTRARY. 25X1 3% MUST ADVISE THAT HOS A LITTLE PERTURBED THAT IF THIS LATTER . 25X11 ROUTE PRESENTED IM THIS FORM TO HE MAY PLUMB FOR IT FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. ALSO WOULD ADVISE THAT HOS MOST DiS- | 25X1APPOINTED ABOUT DECISION TO OMIT ON ALTERNATIVE 25X1ROUTE, FEELING IS THAT 18 AS SAFE ad COULD BE EXPECTED AND THAT HAVING GONE SO FAR IT 15 A PITy.NOT TO GO THE WHOLE WAY AND OBTA: 25X1MAX TGT COVER WITHIN THE ‘CAPABILI…
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →