302545631.pdf

|  1. DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION  |
| --- | --- |
|  21 Oct 65 22/0010Z | St. George, Minnesota multiple  |
|  3. SOURCE | 10. CONCLUSION  |
|  Civilian | V73; Insufficient data for evaluation  |
|  4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | PHOTO: The lack of a definitive signature to the light spot precludes an interpretative type analysis.  |
|  One |   |
|  5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS  |
|  N/A | Observers spotted a bright orange to a brilliant white object that was hovering in the sky. The object changed colors as though pulsating from some inner power. While the object was…

THIS CASE INCLUDES

1 PHOTO 5x7

21 OCT 64

TDEW/UFO

Slide and Prints

Hq USAF SAFOICC

He are returning the slide and two enlargement prints to Mr. [redacted]. for 934th Troop Carrier Group, St. Paul 11, Minnesota, for return to Mr. [redacted]

FOR THE COMMANDER

ERIC T. de JONCKHEERE, Colonel, USAF
Deputy for Technology and Subsystems

4 Atchs
1. Ltr dtd 1 Dec 65
2. Slide
3. Two Prints
4. Photo Analysis Report

COORDINATION:

ORIGINATOR
TDEW/UFO Maj. H. Quintanilla, Jr.

TDEW [signature] DATE 8 Jan 66

UNCLASSIFIED
(when filled in)

# PHOTO ANALYSIS REPORT
NR 65-59

PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES
DATE OF REPORT 29 DECEMBER 1965

SUBJECT UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT REPORT
LOCATION VICINITY NEW ULM, MINNESOTA
DATE 21 OCTOBER 1965

PHOTOGRAPHY
AF __________ IR __________ QUALITY GOOD
P NRS ATTACHED (2) KODACOLOR NEGATIVES AND (2) PRINTS

1. PURPOSE: This report is in response to Work Order Number 65-134 submitted by Major H. Quintanilla, TDEW/UFO for an analysis of the attached negative and two prints. The following analysis represents a joint effort involving TDDPA (Photo Analysis) and TDDPP (Photo Processi…

PHOTO ANALYSIS REPORT NO. 65-59 DATED 29 DECEMBER 1965

c. Constant density of background surrounding the alleged UFO is questionable. Some contrast is normally evident even on a shot of a darkened sky.

In view of the foregoing, an analysis of the original negative might prove beneficial, even if only to clarify the above comments.

PHOTO ANALYSIS BY:
WILLIAM R. KINNEY
Intelligence Research Specialist

APPROVED BY:
Richard L. Chance
RICHARD L. CHANCE
Captain, USAF
Chief, Photo Analysis Division

WILBER PRICE, JR.
Director, Photo Exploitation Directorate

HEADQUARTERS
934TH TROOP CARRIER GROUP, MEDIUM (RESERVE)
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
MINNEAPOLIS-ST PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
ST PAUL 11, MINNESOTA

REPLY TO
ATTN OF: OI
1 Dec 1965

SUBJECT: UFO

TO: Foreign Technical Division, AFSC, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio

1. We are attaching a letter and a negative of a UFO sent by Mr. [redacted] on 26 November 1965 to this office.

2. We have informed him that we have forwarded them on to you and that his negative will be returned to him after we receive the report on your findings.

A.J. WEISBRICK
Information Officer

2 Atch
1. Ltr (dtd 26 Nov 65
2. Negat…

Im Photo Lab
Dist to Ofm. 44 931
November 26, 1965
59355
Gre "Graves" Tucson

934 Troop Carrier Group
International Airport
St. Paul, Minnesota.

Information Officer

Dear Sir:

Inclosed please find a negative of a UFO that I took a picture of on October 21, 1965. Also, my report as to the circumstances.

On October 21, 1965, My wife, my son, my son, gave seventeen, and Mr. & Mrs. Gaylord, Minnesota, were returning from a hunting trip from the Minnesota River Bottoms, near New Ulm, Minnesota.

Two miles west, and two miles north of St. George, Minnesota, we spotted a large bright orange ob…

FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION, AFSC
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED