2e1f397f29ec2a45
302540356.pdf
NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-5·pdf·19.4 MB·13 pages
OCR'd text preview (8 of 13 pages)
Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%
page 1
| 1. DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION | | --- | --- | | 17 July 65 18/0030Z | Burbank, California | | 3. SOURCE | 10. CONCLUSION | | Civilian | Other (REFLECTION) | | 1. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | Photo analysis explains the objects on the prints as being caused by reflection and a double image attributed to reflection through the winshield. Visuals report consistent with this analysis. | | Two | | | 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS | | 2 Minutes | Hazy day. Objects brighter than stars. Sharply outlined. Object appeared to be vapor trail. All of a sudden it sto…
page 2
UNCLASSIFIED PHOTO ANALYSIS REPORT NR 65-41 PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES DATE OF REPORT 13 Sep 1965 SUBJECT UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT LOCATION BURBANK, CALIFORNIA DATE 17 JULY 1965 PHOTOGRAPHY A/ IR QUALITY GOOD P HRS ORN NEGATIVE (FILMSTRIP FRAME) 1. PURPOSE: This report answers Work Order 65-98 from Major L. Quintanilla Jr. (TDEW/UFO) to analyze one negative (filmtrip frame) taken at Burbank, California on 17 July, 1965. 2. ANALYSIS: Mr. [redacted] and Mr. [redacted] (TDDPP) assisted in the analysis of the negative. a. The negative contains two unidentified images which are in close proximity to …
page 3
ENGINEERING SUPPORT WORK REQUEST ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ☐ PHOTO ANALYSIS ☐ MACHINE COMPUTATION PPT NUMBER: A6010301 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Request evaluation of the attached frame and FTD Form 164 as to what most likely cause of unidentified objects were. (Picture was of a town with a car in the street, made by KODAK) REFERENCE MATERIAL: One negative (filmatrip frame), FTD Form 164 on observation of 17 Jul 65, Burbank, Calif. Request all reference materials be returned upon completion of analysis. REQUESTED BY: TDEW/UFO PHONE 69216/66378 I CERTIFY THAT THIS WORK IS AUTHORIZED BY ME AND THAT…
page 4
This case has one (1) photograph missing. 23 Jan 75
page 5
Mrs. Hunt/man/SAFOICC/72842/29 Sep 65 SEP 29 1965 Dear Mr. [redacted] The negative which you submitted to the Air Force for analysis is returned. The double image in the print could be caused by a reflection from the front and rear of the windshield glass. This reflection also accounts for the appearance and disappearance of the object as reported. A copy of the photo analysis report is attached for your information. Thank you for submitting your report to the Air Force. Sincerely, JOHN P. SPAULDING Lt Colonel, USAF Chief, Civil Breach Community Relations Division Office of Information …
page 6
HEADQUARTERS FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO REPLY TO ATTN OF: TDEW SUBJECT: UFO Sighting, 17 Jul 65, Burbank, California SEP 21 1965 TO: Hq USAF SAFOICC (Mrs Hunt) Wash D C 20330 Evaluation on the object observed by Ed [redacted] of Avenue, Royal Oak, Michigan has been completed by the photo analysis section. The double image on the print could be caused by a reflection from the front and rear of the windshield glass. This reflection also accounts for the appearance and disappearance of the object as repo…
page 7
U.S. AIR FORCE TECHNICAL INFORMATION This questionnaire has been prepared so that you can give the U.S. Air Force as much information as possible concerning the unidentified aerial phenomenon that you have observed. Please try to answer as many questions as you possibly can. The information that you give will be used for research purposes. Your name will not be used in connection with any statements, conclusions, or publications without your permission. We request this personal information so that if it is deemed necessary, we may contact you for further details. | 1. When did you see the o…
page 8
Page 2 8. IF you saw the object at NIGHT, what did you notice concerning the STARS and MOON? 8.1 STARS (Circle One): a. None b. A few c. Many d. Don't remember 8.2 MOON (Circle One): a. Bright moonlight b. Dull moonlight c. No moonlight – pitch dark d. Don't remember 9. What were the weather conditions at the time you saw the object? CLOUDS (Circle One): a. Clear sky b. Hazy c. Scattered clouds d. Thick or heavy clouds WEATHER (Circle One): a. Dry b. Fog, mist, or light rain c. Moderate or heavy rain d. Snow e. Don't remember 10. The object appeared: (Circle One): a. Solid b. Transparent c…
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →