33b78ae83f78996d
302536806.pdf
NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-5·pdf·4.7 MB·4 pages
OCR'd text preview (4 of 4 pages)
Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%
page 1
| 1. DATE - TIME GROUP | December 1964 0730Z | | --- | --- | | 2. LOCATION | Seward, Pennsylvania | | 3. SOURCE | Civilian | | 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | One | | 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 2-3 Seconds | | 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | Ground-Visual | | 7. COURSE | West | | 8. PHOTOS | ☐ Yes ☑ No | | 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE | ☐ Yes ☑ No | | 10. CONCLUSION | Astronomical (METEOR) Object description and motion in accord with meteor analysis. | | 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS | Object in flight to West. Duration 2-3 seconds. No noise, no tail. Described as a possible reentry. Observation…
page 2
45433 P.M. 05 Jan 65 Aerial Phenomena Bank (TDEW) Wright-Patterson A.F.B. Dear Sirs; Reentry spotted (or possible reentry) spotted at Seward, Pa. about 4 1/2 weeks ago, by me. A white or ivory glo, something like a shooting star and carbon are light mixed. Lasted about two, three, seconds "over"
page 3
object was going due west at about 2:25 pm or 2:30 A.M. No noise, no tail Yours Truly, J. Gurnon ~~J. Gurnon~~ Seward, Pa.
page 4
METEOR 300 Dec 64 FTD (TDEW) Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433 4 February 1965 Mr. [redacted] Seward, Pennsylvania Dear Mr., Thank you for your recent letters describing possible satellite re-entries. The objects which you have described are similar to either meteor or satellite decay reports. Satellite decays are distinguished from meteor observations by the direction of flight and duration of the sighting. A satellite re-entry over Pennsylvania would hold an easterly component and the duration would be slightly longer than that described in your letter. The Air Force appreciates your re…
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →