4f5c5507cfec9d54
28980744.pdf
NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-3·pdf·60.8 MB·9 pages
OCR'd text preview (8 of 9 pages)
Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%
page 1
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD | 1. DATE | 2. LOCATION | 12. CONCLUSIONS | | --- | --- | --- | | DR 25 October 1958 | Yucca Valley, California | ☐ Was Balloon ☐ Probably Balloon ☐ Possibly Balloon | | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP Local _________ GNT. _________ | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ☑ Ground-Visual ☐ Air-Visual ☐ Ground-Radar ☐ Air-Intercept Radar | ☐ Was Aircraft ☐ Probably Aircraft ☐ Possibly Aircraft | | 5. PHOTOS ☑ Yes ☐ No | 6. SOURCE Civilian | ☐ Was Astronomical ☐ Probably Astronomical ☐ Possibly Astronomical | | 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 6 seconds | 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS one | 9. COURSE sta…
page 2
SAFIS-3/Maj Tacker; 1/74966/27 Oct 58 27 October 1958 Dear Major Friend: Mr. [redacted], personally visited the Pentagon on 25 October 1958 and left the inclosed roll of 8 mm film on unidentified flying objects for analysis and identification. Please see what the film looks like and give me an opinion to forward with the film when I return it to Mr. [redacted]. Sincerely, LAWRENCE J. TACKER Major, USAF Executive Officer Public Information Division Office of Information Services Incl a/s Major Robert J. Friend Air Technical Intelligence Center Headquarters, Air Materiel Command Wright-P…
page 3
UNCLASSIFIED Unidentified Flying Object ( ) Classification Cancelled (see footnote) Auth: W. W. 6167 D.O. By: J. H. H. W. Date: 3 Jan 68 SAFIS-3, Attn: Maj. L. J. Tucker 19 December 1958 AFCIN-4E 1 4E4/Maj Friend/ac/69216/Bldg 828 1. The ATIC had those portions of Mr. [redacted] film containing the so-called UFO enlarged for detailed analysis. The enlargements did not reveal any more detail than did the observations of the projected image or inspection of the film under a microscope. 2. The analysis of the film indicates the object was stationary, yet Mr. [redacted] was not concerned enoug…
page 4
DOCUMENT RECEIPT REGISTRY OR CONTROL NUMBER DATE DISPATCHED TO: Mr. Yucca Valley, Calif FROM: (Return signed original receipt) SAFIS, Office of Information Services Pentagon (Maj Lawrence J. Tacker) Each entry listed below will describe a document and its inclosures, and will be separated by a horizontal line drawn from margin to margin. Each entry will include: 1. Description of Basic Material: File number, type (number of copies and copy numbers), source, addressee, date, subject (short title, if subject is classified). 2. Number of Indorsements: Number of copies and copy numbers of eac…
page 5
UNCLASSIFIED 5. It is the opinion of the ATIC that this is the photograph of a reflection, probably planned by Mr. H K Zilbert 1 Incl: Film H. K. GILBERT Colonel, USAF APCIN-4E DISPATCHED DEC 32 09 04 28 UNCLASSIFIED 2
page 6
JER SHEET UNCLASSIFIED SUSPENSE ORIGIN OF BASIC UNCLASSIFIED DATE ASSIGNED BY DATE TYPE NO. SUBJECT Unidentified Flying Object (Van Tassel) ROUTING Initial "IN" column to denote review prior to action. Initial "OUT" column to denote review of completed action. (X for action; √ for coordination.) | IN | OFFICE | OUT | IN | OFFICE | OUT | IN | OFFICE | OUT | IN | OFFICE | OUT | IN | OFFICE | OUT | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | OIN-1 | | | OIN-2 | | | OIN-3 | | | OIN-4 | | | | AFOIN | | | OIN-1X | | | OIN-2X | | | …
page 7
UNCLASSIFIED 5. It is the opinion of the ATIC that this is the photograph of a reflection, probably planned by M. HK. Y. U. S. H. K. GILBERT Colonel, USAF AFCIN-4E 1 Incl: Film DOWNGRADED AT 3 YEAR INTERVALS: DECLASSIFIED AFTER 12 YEARS. DOD DIR 5200.10 UNCLASSIFIED 2
page 8
5 January 1959 Dear Mr. [redacted]: I am returning herewith the film you submitted to the United States Air Force for evaluation which you thought contained a photograph of an unidentified flying object. The Air Technical Intelligence Center had those portions of the film containing the so-called unidentified flying object enlarged for detailed analysis. The enlargements did not reveal any more detail than did the observations of the projected image or inspection of the film under a microscope. The analysis of the film indicates the object was stationary and was photographed for a total ti…
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →