54b1b4a98f6c7dc4
28950692.pdf
NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-2·pdf·28.2 MB·6 pages
Scores
1.1
Document value
0.0
Cross-references
2.0
Provenance
3.1
Info density
0.0
Topic relevance
0.0
Anomalousness
OCR'd text preview (6 of 6 pages)
Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%
page 1
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD | 1. DATE | 2. LOCATION | 3. CONCLUSIONS | | --- | --- | --- | | 2. DATE-TIME GROUP | Anandale, Virginia | Was Balloon Probably Balloon Possibly Balloon | | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | Was Aircraft Probably Aircraft Possibly Aircraft | | Serial: 2700 INT | ☑ Onions-Visual ☐ Ground-Rader | ☑ Was Astronomical Probably Astronomical Possibly Astronomical | | 5. PHOTOS | ☑ Yes ☐ No | ☑ Was Astronomical Probably Astronomical Possibly Astronomical | | 6. SOURCE | Dept Labor Executive | ☑ Other Insufficient Data for Evaluation Unknown | | 7. LE…
page 2
2. Atiaa 3. Atia 5. C. files X RE046 WPC042 YDC043 TYB036 TDB043 JEPHQ A025 PP JEDEN JEDWP JEPLG 333 DE JEPHQ 02A P 120153Z ZNJ FM HQ USAF WASHDC TO JEDEN/CGAIRDEFCOM ENT AFB COLO JEDWP/CHIEF ATIC WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB HIO JEPLG/CGTAC LANGLEY AFB VA FROM AFOIN 57652 FLYOBRPT ATTN ATIAA-2S. ONE SPHERICAL SHAPED UNIDENTIFIED OBJECT WAS OBSERVED FLYING ABOVE AND BEYOND COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT DC4 OR DC6 HEADED IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION IN VICINITY OF ANNANDALE CMA VIRGINIA, OBJECT APPEARED TO BE SMALLER THAN A DIME CMA AND WAS OBSERVED FOR THIRTY OR FORTY FIVE SECONDS. NO AERODINAMIC FEATURES NOTICE…
page 3
PAGE TWO JEPHQ #2A EMPLOYEE AT DEPT OF LABOR. MR. IS ASST DIRECTOR OFFICE VISUAL GROUND OBSERVATION WAS MADE FROM LEFT FRONT WINDOW OF AUTOMOBILE TRAVELING SOUTH ON COLUMBIA PIKE AT THE BARCROFT APARTMENTS IN ARLINGTON CMA VIRGINIA. MRS WAS IN AUTOMOBILE AT TIME BUT DID NOT HAVE TIME TO VIEW OBJECT AFTER CALLED TO HER ATTENTION 12/0209Z SEP JEPHQ Cyr 1
page 4
PROJECT 10073 WORKSHEET I. GENERAL | 1. DATE | 2. LOCATION | 3. TIME | | --- | --- | --- | | 11 Sept '53 | Commander, Va | Local: 1200EST Zebra: 2200 | | 4. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED FROM THE GROUND? | ☑ Yes ☐ Naked Eye ☐ Binoculars ☐ Telescope ☐ Theodolite | ☐ No | | --- | --- | --- | | 5. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED BY GROUND RADAR? | ☐ Yes ☐ By One Set ☐ By Two Sets ☐ By Three Sets | ☑ No | | 6. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED FROM THE AIR? | ☐ Yes ☐ A/C Observed Object ☐ Interception Attempted ☐ No Intercept Attempted | ☑ No | | 7. WERE AIRCRAFT SCRAMBLED TO INTERCEPT? | ☐ Yes ☐ A/C Scrambled ☐ Visual C…
page 5
IV. BALLOON DATA 21. WERE BALLOONS RELEASED IN AREA? ☐ Yes ☑ No 22. TIME SINCE SCHEDULED BALLOON RELEASE: 1 hr. Minutes 23. POSSIBLE BALLOON LAUNCH SITES DOWNWIND OF SIGHTING: | Location | Type | Launching Agency | Lighted? | | Describe Lighting | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | Yes | No | | | a. | Anon. T. 3 Va | Pitell | U.S.N. | (irregular) | | | b. | Merford 1/2 Va | Vadimonde Pitell | “ | | | | c. | | | | | | | d. | | | | | | (attach overlay) V. EVALUATION 21. EVALUATION OF SOURCE: ☐ Excellent ☐ Good ☑ Fair ☐ Poor ☐ Unreliable ☐ Extremely …
page 6
PROJECT 10073 WEATHER DATA SH | 1. DATE OF OBSERVATION | 2. TIME OF OBSERVATION | 3. STATION OBSERVING | | --- | --- | --- | | 4. WINGS ALOFT: | | | | ALTITUDE (feet) | VELOCITY (knots) | DIRECTION (degrees) | | 0 | | 25,000 | | 1,000 | | 30,000 | | 2,000 | | 35,000 | | 3,000 | | 40,000 | | 4,000 | | 45,000 | | 5,000 | | 50,000 | | 6,000 | | 55,000 | | 7,000 | | 60,000 | | 8,000 | | 65,000 | | 9,000 | | 70,000 | | 10,000 | | 75,000 | | 12,000 | | 80,000 | | 14,000 | | 85,000 | | 16,000 | | 90,000 | | 18,000 | | 95,000 | | 20,000 | | 100,0…
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →