550416679054b5f6
25_Sky_View_Final_Draft.pdf
NARA·UAP_Bulk_Downloads·pdf·2.6 MB·16 pages
Scores
5.1
Document value
10.0
Cross-references
4.0
Provenance
4.2
Info density
9.8
Topic relevance
0.0
Anomalousness
Events this document cites (1)
OCR'd text preview (8 of 16 pages)
Source: embedded
page 0
025 Public UAP Sightings and the Environment: An Analysis of Sky View Potential Richard M. Medina University of Utah Simon Brewer University of Utah Sean M. Kirkpatrick Department of Defense Proposed journal for submission: Annals of the American Association of Geographers Introduction There has been growing interest by the United States government in Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). Given the new focus on this potential security threat and the operational safety risks posed by these objects, the UAP Task Force was initiated on August 4, 2020 (U.S. Department of Defense, 20…
page 1
025 DNI report summarizes that there is no single explanation for all of these UAP, with potential sources including clutter, commercial drones, national security threats, and other unexplained phenomena. In 1969, another government effort, Project Blue Book determined that 701 sightings out of 12,618 were “unidentified,” but that there was no evidence of 1) any national security threat, 2) advanced technologies beyond present capabilities or knowledge, and 3) extraterrestrial vehicles (U.S. Air Force, nd). While there are some logical explanations for what many are seeing, that they thi…
page 2
025 Much of the research on UAPs has relied on firsthand accounts, psychological explanations, or specific events, which limits the systematic analysis of large area patterns (e.g., see Zimmer, 1984; Zimmer, 1985; Spanos et al., 1993; Salisbury, 1974). Data availability for large studies has been a longstanding issue, and the few studies that exist focus on smaller scale patterns and trends. The most likely explanation for a portion of UAP sightings is natural phenomena. For example, the planet Venus is the brightest planet and is often mistaken for a UAP. At times, it is seen close to …
page 3
025 Maybe the most popular natural explanation for UAP sightings is ball lightning. Ball lightning incidents are characterized by “a spherical or roughly spherical light-emitting object whose size varies from a few cm to a meter or more, with an average diameter of about 20 cm, and whose colors vary from red to yellow, white, blue, and (rarely) green” (Shmatov and Stephan, 2019, p. 1). Ball lightning is a rare event and data on its occurrences often relies on eyewitness accounts. These events are believed to most often occur at or near an ongoing thunderstorm. One of the issues with the …
page 4
025 were given, but were still locatable, when spelling errors in the city field were corrected. For those, coordinates were added using online Microsoft services to construct a more complete dataset. The final resulting mappable dataset includes 121,949 points (locatable in the United States), which is 99.16% of the total extraction. For simplicity and interpretation, we focus on the conterminous U.S. from 2001 to 2020, which reduces the number of reported sightings to 98,724. For the analysis we use the total number of sightings per county across this time period to allow us to focus o…
page 5
025 Figure 2 NUFORC Reported Sighting Spatial Distribution for the Conterminous U.S. from 2001-2020 In the spatial sciences, data like these are typically referred to as Volunteered Geographical Information (VGI). VGI are geographic information that are volunteered either knowingly or unknowingly by individuals, typically with the assistance of location enabled digital tools (Goodchild, 2007), and the issues connected to the use of these datasets has been extensively discussed. Those vulnerabilities are present here, along with others given the nature of this dataset. Like with other cr…
page 6
025 the only dataset of this size and detail that allows for geographic research. Furthermore, it is impossible to discredit over 120,000 cases. It should also be mentioned here that NUFORC accepts online, phone, and written reports to assist in unbiasing the dataset with only online activity. Explanatory Variables We use 3 explanatory datasets to represent physical and built environment attributes that would restrict the view of the sky: light pollution, cloud cover, and tree canopy cover. Additionally, we use 2 datasets that represent added airborne activity that might be mistaken for…
page 7
025 Military installations – Military installation data are sourced to U.S. Census TIGER/Line shapefiles and downloaded from data.gov (data.gov, 2022). The U.S. Census created this dataset in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The data represent the boundaries of military installations. For this research, those boundaries were overlaid onto U.S. counties, where the area of each county that is military installation is calculated. Models The NUFORC dataset is first explored alone to identify general spatial patterns of reported…
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →