562a3557deed8b76
NASA-UAP-D017_Preliminary-Gemini-4-Crew-Debriefing_Part2_1965.pdf
NASA·PURSUE_2026·pdf·31.0 MB
Scores
1.6
Document value
0.0
Cross-references
2.0
Provenance
3.2
Info density
1.5
Topic relevance
0.0
Anomalousness
Events this document cites (1)
OCR'd text preview (8 of pages)
Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%
page 1
DECLASSIFIED Authority: NW 91526 CONFIDENTIAL 65 CLASSIFICATION CHANGE To UNCLASSIFIED By authority of PO 11652, 6-1-72 Changed by A. Bergstein Date NOV 20 1973 PRELIMINARY GT-4 FLIGHT CREW DEBRIEFING TRANSCRIPT PART II Prepared By Spacecraft Operations Branch Flight Crew Support Division June 18, 1965 This material contains information affecting the national defense of the United States within the meaning of the Espionage Laws, Title 18. U. S. C. Section 793 and 794, the transmission or revelation of which in any manner to an unauthorized person is prohibited by law. Group 4: Downgrade at 3 y…
page 2
1
page 3
CONFIDENTIAL # PREFACE This preliminary transcript was made from voice tape recordings of the GT-4 flight crew debriefing conducted aboard the recovery ship, the USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965, and concluded at the Manned Spacecraft Center on June 12, 1965. Although all the material contained in this transcript has been edited, the urgent need for the preliminary transcript by mission analysis personnel precluded a thorough editorial review prior to its publication. Errors in this transcript will be corrected as soon as possible and an official transcript will be published at a later date. This…
page 4
^{}[]page 5
CONFIDENTIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS | Paragraph | Page number | | --- | --- | | 8.0 SYSTEMS OPERATION | | | 8.1 Platform | 1 | | 8.2 OAMS | 5 | | 8.3 RCS | 17 | | 8.4 Environmental Control System | 22 | | 8.5 Communications | 68 | | 8.6 Electrical System | 82 | | 8.7 Computer | 87 | | 8.8 Crew Station | 93 | | 8.9 Bio-Medicat | 134 | | 9.0 OPERATIONAL CHECKS | | | 9.1 Apollo Landmark Identification (D-6) | 144 | | 9.2 Apollo Yaw Orientation | 168 | | 9.3 One Attitude Thruster Failure Check | 171 | | 9.4 Horizon Scanner Track Check | 172 | | 9.5 Horizon Scanner C…
page 6
CONFIDENTIAL 12.0 PRE-MISSION PLANNING 12.1 Mission Plan (Trajectory) ... 234 12.2 Flight Plan ... 234 12.3 Spacecraft Changes ... 239 12.4 Mission Rules ... 240 12.5 Experiments ... 241 12.6 Training Activities ... 245 13.0 MISSION CONTROL 13.1 GO/NO GO's ... 249 13.2 PLA and CLA Updates ... 249 13.3 Consumables ... 249 13.4 Flight Plan Changes ... 250 13.5 Systems ... 254 14.0 TRAINING 14.1 Gemini Mission Simulator ... 255 14.2 LTV Simulation ... 260 14.3 Centrifuge ... 261 14.4 Translation and Docking Trainer ... 262 14.5 Planetarium ... 263 14.6 Systems Briefings ... 266 14.7 Flight Exp…
page 7
CONFIDENTIAL 8.0 SYSTEMS OPERATION 8.1 Platform McDivitt Actually, the first portion of any alinement is to cage the thing. The case of caging the thing is much more important than the alinement itself. In the daytime I felt that I could cage the platform to a reference with an error plus or minus about 3 or 4 degrees in all axes. Did you think we could do that well? White Only in the daytime. McDivitt The yaw was a little problem. It took longer to get it, but if you kept after it for awhile, I felt that you could get down to just a few degrees. White Within a couple of degrees. McDivi…
page 8
CONFIDENTIAL White I'm not sure. McDivitt The caging of the thing with small-end-forward in the daytime was relatively easy. At night I don't think it would be quite that simple. I think what you would have to do at night time is to point the spacecraft down at the ground pretty much so you can see the track across the ground. I could see which way the land was moving under me. I felt--although I never did this--that if I could do that and then roll around to where I had no bank angle, and face in my yaw direction, either small-end or blunt-end-forward, stop the roll there and pitch up to th…
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →