5ec24af89a1f80e5

302531452.pdf

NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-5·pdf·8.8 MB·5 pages

OCR'd text preview (5 of 5 pages)

Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%

page 1
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD

|  1. DATE | 2. LOCATION | 12. CONCLUSIONS  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  26 Jan 64 | Gainsville, Fla | ☐ Was Balloon ☐ Probably Balloon ☐ Possibly Balloon  |
|  3. DATE-TIME GROUP Local 27/0435Z GMT | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ☑ Ground-Visual ☐ Ground-Radar ☐ Air-Visual ☐ Air-Intercept Radar | ☑ Was Aircraft ☐ Probably Aircraft ☐ Possibly Aircraft  |
|  5. PHOTOS ☐ Yes ☑ No | 6. SOURCE civilian | ☐ Was Astronomical ☐ Probably Astronomical ☐ Possibly Astronomical  |
|  7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 10 minutes | 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS one | 9. COURSE SW  |
|  10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SI
page 2
UFO
January 26, 1964
AEP

The University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida

N.A.S.A.
Washington, D.C.

Dear Sirs:

On Sunday, January 26, 1964, I observed a yellowish-orange light (about 585 milliliter in wavelength) cross my meridian and then pass out of sight approximately ten minutes later (this was from 11:25-11:35 p.m.). It traversed a southwesterly path, and it, along with the full moon, were the only objects visible in the overcast sky.

My friends and I decided, since there was only this one yellowish light visible, and that it appeared too high to be a jet aircraft or the like, that it 
page 3
PINEBURY
2-8M
1964
F.L.B.

Information Bureau
N.A.S.A. (Space Administration)
Washington, D.C.

Air Mail

In triplicate of Florida
Bureau will provide
Air Mail
page 4
HEADQUARTERS
FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO

REPLY TO
ATTN OF: TDEW

SUBJECT: UFO Sighting (70 miles West of Jacksonville, Florida)

TO: Hq USAF SAFOI-PB (Mrs Gaiser)
Wash 25 D C

1. The following information is provided to assist you in a reply to Mr [redacted], University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Our records indicate no previous correspondence from Mr [redacted].

2. The object reported had a southwesterly component ruling out all known satellites. The duration of ten minutes is not excessive for an
page 5
26 Jan 64

February 20, 1964

Dear Mr. Weiss:

This is in response to your letter of January 26, 1964, in which you reported observing an unidentified flying object.

Since this object had a southwesterly component, it could not have been a known satellite. Although there are no high altitude air routes over Gainesville heading southwest, the duration of your sighting (ten minutes) is not excessive for an aircraft at high altitude, particularly since you indicate that it crossed the zenith. If the object was an aircraft, it was not on a regular schedule. However, this does not rule out aircraf

Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →