28976964.pdf

PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD

|  1. DATE | 2. LOCATION | 12. CONCLUSIONS  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  1 Feb 58 | Cuyahoga, Falls, Ohio | ☐ Was Balloon ☐ Probably Balloon ☐ Possibly Balloon  |
|  3. DATE-TIME GROUP | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | ☐ Was Aircraft ☐ Probably Aircraft ☐ Possibly Aircraft  |
|  Local 2120 - 2126 EST GMT 02/0220Z | ☐ Ground-Visual ☐ Air-Visual ☐ Ground-Radar ☐ Air-Intercept Radar | ☐ Was Astronomical ☐ Probably Astronomical ☐ Possibly Astronomical  |
|  5. PHOTOS ☐ Yes ☑ No | 6. SOURCE not available | ☐ Other ☑ Insufficient Data for Evaluation ☐ Unknown  |
|  7. LENGTH OF OBSER…

MR. FROM THE WEATHER STATION AT VANDALIA
READ THE FOLLOWING TELETYPE TO HE OVER THE PHONE
THE TELETYPE CAME FROM CANTON, OHIO
ADDRESSED TO OPERATION BLUEBOOK
"HAVE GOTTEN SEVERAL PHONE CALLS FROM RELIABLE
SOURCES OF A SIGHTING OF A STRANGE OBJECT
IN THE SKY OVER CUYAHOGA FALLS, OHIO.
TIME OF THE SIGHTING WAS BETWEEN 2120-2126
EASTERN STANDARD TIME. THE SHAPE OF THE OBJECT
WAS CIGAR-LIKE, SILVER IN COLOR WITH A BRIGHT
GLOW. IT WAS TRAVELING AT TREMENDIOUS SPEEDS
IN A WESTERN DIRECTION. NO APPEARANCE OF
UNUSUAL 'LIGHT' OR SPOTLIGHT IN AREA TONIGHT."
I CHECKED TO FIND OUT WHO THE SOURCES WERE
BUT…

called 58th A.M. in a
combat control center to check
in any flight operations over Cuyahaga Falls
area, or any radar reports of strange flying
objects.

2. The 30th air division was contacted, who controls
the area concerned, and they had no reports of
~~alerts change~~ UFOs over the area.

3. Therefore, it is concluded that the object
observed was a conventional ~~aircraft~~ object,
however, there is not sufficient information
to identify the sighting.