7a72d4b46b93410c
28949203.pdf
NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-2·pdf·43.6 MB·8 pages
Scores
1.0
Document value
0.0
Cross-references
2.0
Provenance
2.7
Info density
0.0
Topic relevance
0.0
Anomalousness
OCR'd text preview (8 of 8 pages)
Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%
page 1
PROJECT 123/3 RECORD CARD | 1. LOCATION | 2. LOCATION | 3. CONCLUDING | | --- | --- | --- | | Davis-Monthon AFB, Arizona | Davis-Monthon AFB, Arizona | ☐ Was Research ☐ Probably Balloon ☐ Possibly Balloon | | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | 5. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | ☐ Was Aircraft ☐ Probably Aircraft ☐ Possibly Aircraft | | ☐ Personal-Vessel ☐ Air-Vessel ☐ Air-Intercept Radar | ☐ Personal-Radar ☐ Air-Vessel ☐ Air-Intercept Radar | | | 6. SOURCE | 7. SOURCE | ☐ Was Astronomical ☐ Probably Astronomical ☐ Possibly Astronomical | | Civilian & military | Civilian & military | | | 8. NUMBER …
page 2
PROJECT 10073 NURSERET I. GENERAL | 1. DATE | 2. LOCATION | 3. TIME | | --- | --- | --- | | 27 Aug '52 | Davis, Northern AFB, Arizona | Local: 0915 hrs Zebra: 2615 | 4. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED FROM THE GROUND? ☑ Yes ☐ Yes ☑ Naked Eye ☐ Binoculars ☐ Telescope ☐ Theodolite 5. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED BY GROUND RADAR? ☐ Yes ☐ By One Set ☐ By Two Sets ☐ By Three Sets 6. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED FROM THE AIR? ☐ Yes ☑ No A/C Observed Object ☐ Interception Attempted ☐ No Intercept Attempted 7. WERE AIRCRAFT SCRAMBLED TO INTERCEPT? ☐ Yes ☑ No A/C Scrambled ☐ Visual Contact Made ☐ A/I Contact Made ☐ No Cont…
page 3
IV. BALLOON DATA 21. WERE BALLOONS RELEASED IN AREA? ☐ Yes ☐ No 22. TIME SINCE SCHEDULED BALLOON RELEASE: 11:35 Minutes 23. POSSIBLE BALLOON LAUNCH SITES DOWNWIND OF SIGHTING: | Location | Type | Launching Agency | Lighted? | Describe Lighting | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | a. | Tunic | Mwin | Yes | No | | b. | | | | | | c. | | | | | | d. | | | | | (attach overlay) V. EVALUATION 21. EVALUATION OF SOURCE: ☐ Excellent ☐ Good ☐ Fair ☐ Poor ☐ Unreliable ☐ Extremely Doubtful ☐ Hoax 22. DETAILS OF REPORT: ☐ Good ☐ Fair ☐ Poor ☐ Insufficient to Evaluate 23. FINAL EVA…
page 4
PROJECT 10073 WEATHER DATA SH | 1. DATE OF OBSERVATION | 2. TIME OF OBSERVATION | 3. STATION OBSERVING | | --- | --- | --- | | 27 Aug 52 | ? | Tuscan A. U.S. | | ALTITUDE (feet) | VELOCITY (knots) | DIRECTION (degrees) | ALTITUDE (feet) | VELOCITY (knots) | DIRECTION (degrees) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 0 | 4 | 575 | 25,000 | 19 | 210 | | 1,000 | | | 30,000 | 10 | 210 | | 2,000 | | | 35,000 | | | | 3,000 | | | 40,000 | | | | 4,000 | 4 | 340 | 45,000 | | | | 5,000 | 4 | 340 | 50,000 | | | | 6,000 | 2 | 350 | 55,000 | | | | 7,000 | 4 | 50 | 60…
page 5
UAA R-136-52 PLYGBYT Davis-Wenthan AFB, Tucson, Arizona 43rd Bomb Wing, Intelligence Division 31 August 1952 27 August 1952 D-6 Capt. R. H. Postalozzi T/Sgt Amadeo J. Sandoval AFDIN C/SC - 2 1. At approximately 09:15, CST, 27 August 1952, T/Sgt Amadeo J. Sandoval AF-0901532 saw two unidentified, blue-white, brilliant, flying objects over Davis-Wenthan Air Force Base, Tucson, Arizona. The objects were at different altitudes, traveling in a pendulous, erratic, motion at varying speeds at an unestimable altitude. The objects at first ceased to be traveling to the south but object #2 swung to the…
page 6
SECRET IR-13G-52 43rd Bomb Wing, Intelligence Div 2 4 1. The objects observed by T/Sgt Sandoval and A/1C Smith appeared to be of a metallic substance of a brilliant, blue-white color and round in shape. The size and altitude could not be judged but object #1 (see diagram) seemed to be about twice as high as object #2 with object #2 appearing to be of the size of a B-29 at about 10,000 feet of altitude. Object #1 was in fairly close proximity to the sun and was traveling in a general south direction at a slow rate of speed in an erratic, pandulous course. Object #2 was traveling in a general …
page 7
TR-136-52 43rd Bomb Wing, Intelligence Div 3 4 6. Physical Evidence: A. Photographs of Object #2 (1) Photo #1 is contact print (2) Photo #2 is enlargement B. Photos were taken with a speed Graphic Camera at between 100 and 222, 1/100 of a second with a yellow B-2 filter. Picture taken with camera in approximately vertical position. 7. Interception or Identification action taken: None Comments of Originator: 1. Sandoval and Smith are very certain of what they saw. Each man's statements were clear and concise and in all phases agreed on what happened. 2. Numerous people in the city of Tu…
page 8
IR-136-52 43rd Bomb Wing, Intelligence Div Diagram SUN OBJECT #1 DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OBJECT #2 DIRECTION OF TRAVEL TAIL ON OBJECT #2 DURING FAST MOVEMENT
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →