28959059.pdf

PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 1. DATE 2. LOCATION 12. CONCLUSIONS ‘ i 0 Was Balloon 19 July 1954 Brooklyn N.Y. QO EroRebry eteee 3. DATE-TIME GROUP 4. TYEROF OBSERVATION O Possibly Balloon Vis) ri Bi . Local SRT sp or ra O Ground- Vi sual O Ground-Radar i Bishably: Avera GMT NOT GIVEN O Air Visual O Air-Intercspt Radar O Possibly Aircraft 5. PHOTOS 6. SOURCE O Was Astronomical QO Yes O Probably Astronomical ee CIVILIAN O Possibly Astronomical 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE 1 MA OL SY f smeitect Se SERN SAE Re Insufficient Data for Evaluation NOY GIVEN NOT GIVEN NOY GIVEN…

( Sh. THSONIAN INSTITUTION ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY SECTION OF UPPER ATMOSPHERE STUDIES IGY OPTICAL SATELLITE TRACKING PROGRAM 60 GARDEN STREET CAMBRIDGE 38, MASSACHUSETTS March 18, 1959 Ma jor aii? SAFIS=3 The Pentagon Washington 25, D.C. Dear Major Tacker: I am enclosing another letter regarding the "UFO" which I recently received and which possibly you might be interested in answering. Sincerely yours, jhe tee J. Allen ek Associate Director JAH: le

SiS el Ver CGS 2h March 1959 Dear ir ees Your letter of 5 March concerning unidentified Plying objects, addressed to Professor J. A. Hynek, has been referred to this office for reply. , The theories advanced in your letter are most interesting. However, to date no authenticated evidence exists to support the theory that interplanetary svace travel exists in reverse. Neither does evidence exist indicating the UrO phenomena to be hostile or a threat of any kind against the security of the United States. If, in your opinion, your sighting or 19 July 1954 proved to the contrary, we would be most i…

p eo e wr ght Mai .n Ko rnberg oA ‘ Mikes, 1135-fort VY third Ste | Se Brooklyn 19,N.Y. 3/5/59 Prof. JA. Hynek Ooservatory Cambridge, Masse Dear Professor Hynek: L cannot begin with an obvious pretention for my inclination is natural enough! I desire to approach the road dead-center, in the hop it can lead to the Inn, where Man can reside in comfort. Long ago Sir J. Arthur Thomson wrote a fine book Riddles of Science: and this I pos: to you, as a Scientist, certain riddles that have appeared, albeit, sinc tne atoms nave been exploding: and Since we, Mankind, have beenexplorin the regions above…

f \ is Pei ae t 3 Page two / The second riddle is based on ovservation and is in- directly involved with the first. Seeing it is a fact that the UFO's are real and are not illusory phantoms or ones! imagination: which 1s shrinking because of the achieverents already accomplished by science. Jt deals with the loss of our space equipment in mysterious fashion! What has happened to our flights: after their successful blast off? On several occasions it has been announced that there is no explanation for their disappearance. As in the case of the Vandenberg Bas The explanations‘ gigen are not in co…