bc5b429934d0ea63
DOCID_3177591_SEALED_OK.PDF
NSA·UFO_FOIA·pdf·427 KB·14 pages
Scores
3.5
Document value
0.0
Cross-references
6.0
Provenance
4.2
Info density
4.0
Topic relevance
0.3
Anomalousness
OCR'd text preview (8 of 14 pages)
Source: embedded
page 0
Doc ID: 3177591 Doc Ref ID: A411685 .. ,. • "' - Responsive What Every Cryptologist Should Know about Pearl Habor (U}-----------------------------------------------------------------TOM .JOHNSON 55 (U) Further analyses of the events surrounding the "day that will live in infamy." Approved for release in FOIA Case 114591 as released in MDR Case 52993 on July 11, 2007
page 1
Doc ID: 3177591 Doc Ref ID: A411685 What Every Cryptologist Should Know about Pearl Harbor TOM JOHNSON UNCLASSIFIED The surprise Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 was an event of surpassing importance in American history. But beyond that, it was the most important event of American cryptologic history. As cryptologists we should study Pearl Harbor for its impact on our profession. This impact is felt in two ways. a. It has influenced how the American public views our profession. This has been influenced, in turn, by the winds of political ch…
page 2
Doc ID: 3177591 Doc Ref ID: A411685 UNCLASSIFIED CRYPTOLOGIC QUARTERLY That was on 23 January 1942, only a month after Knox had returned from Hawaii. The administration was clearly proceeding with a good deal of haste to identify the culprits. On 28 February Knox and Stimson issued statements accepting the retirements of Kimmel and Short. A statement of charges was being prepared concerning dereliction of duty, which would later be adjudicated in a courts martial. The trial would proceed, however, "only at such a time as the public interest and safet…
page 3
Doc ID: 3177591 Doc Ref ID: A411685 WHAT EVERY CRYPTOLOGIST SHOULD KNOW UNCLASSIFIED met long ago. Now it just so happened that controversy over the Army and Navy boards occurred in the middle of the 1944 Presidential election. The Republicans were having difficulty finding an issue that would convince the public to evict a President in the middle of a world war. Surprise at Pearl Harbor was one of their few useful weapons. Republican congressmen began raising the cry of cover-up. Hugh Scott, a senator from Pennsylvania, claimed to know that the Aust…
page 4
Doc ID: 3177591 Doc Ref ID: A411685 UNCLASSIFIED CRYPTOLOGIC QUARTERLY The testimony of General Marshall and Admiral Stark would indicate that the Chief Executive took the ominous news so calmly that he made no effort to consult with them. Did he deliberately seek the Pearl Harbor attack in order to get America into the war? ... This problem grows more complicated as we watch the approach of zero hour. At 9:00 A.M. on 7 December, Lieutenant Commander Kramer delivered to Admiral Stark the final installment of the Japanese instruction to Nomura .... But…
page 5
Doc ID: 3177591 Doc Ref ID: A411685 WHAT EVERY CRYPTOLOGIST SHOULD KNOW UNCLASSIFIED The far right began losing its influence in the early days of the Eisenhower administration, and McCarthy died in 1957 a thoroughly discredited man. At the same time the academic debate over revisionism faded after the publication of Barnes's book. The argument was temporarily revived in 1955 by the publication of Admiral Kimmel's memoirs (Admiral Kimmel's Story), which took the administration to task for withholding information from the commanders at Pearl Harbor. K…
page 6
Doc ID: 3177591 Doc Ref ID: A411685 UNCLASSIFIED CRYPI'OLOGIC QUARTERLY called by the American cryptologists JN-25, and were privy to Japanese intentions, even though the American Navy had not yet broken it. (He also noted with interest that the U.S. had given the British a Purple analog machine, used to decipher Magic traffic, and speculated that they might have had more Magic decrypts than we did.) He went on to hypothesize that Churchill may have either passed a warning to Roosevelt on 26 November, in which case the Americans would be culpable for…
page 7
Doc ID: 3177591 Doc Ref ID: A411685 WHAT EVERY CRYPTOLOGIST SHOULD KNOW UNCLASSIFIED According to Toland, other Sigint-based warnings came from the Dutch, who had broken Japanese consular codes and had information about Japanese attacks on Hawaii, Philippines, Malaya, and Thailand. (This was entirely possible since the consular codes were known to be vulnerable, and some of the messages did carry information of this type.) Still another warning came from the British, who on 6 December warned the American observer in Cairo, Colonel Bonner Fellers, of …
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →