302541844.pdf

|  1. DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION  |
| --- | --- |
|  4 August 65 05/0500Z | Honolulu, Hawaii  |
|  3. SOURCE | 10. CONCLUSION  |
|  Civilian | INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION  |
|  4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | Regarded as non-significant and no investigation made. Insufficient data for evaluation.  |
|  One |   |
|  5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS  |
|  Not Reported | Bright light in sky reported by teenager. No additional reports of anything unusual from area.  |
|  6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION |   |
|  Ground-Visual |   |
|  7. COURSE |   |
|  Not Reported |   |
|  8. PHO…

PACIFIC AIR FORCES BASE COMMAND
United States Air Force
APO San Francisco 95533
UNCLASSIFIED
REPLY TO ATTN OF: PACAF Base Command (BDI) 9 August 1965
SUBJECT: U.F.O.'s in Hawaii - 2 August to 5 August 1965
TO: AFSC (FTD)
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio

1. Following is a summary of UFO activity in the Hawaiian area, 2 August to 5 August 1965. Five UFO's were reported. One of them (part b) received widespread headlines in Hawaii resulting in increased reporting and publicity regarding UFO's.

a. On 3 August, 0600Z (3/2000 local) a family living in Waikiki beach reported bright lights moving across t…

UNCLASSIFIED

c. On 4 August at 1230Z (approximately) the crew of a TAC C-130 enroute from Travis AFB to Hickam AFB observed a high altitude, high speed UFO pass directly overhead on heading 229°. Location of the aircraft was 125W to 128W-35N, altitude 20,000'. Object was a bright light.

(1) Ocean station November sighted the same object and reported that it lit up the whole sky as it passed overhead.

(2) Investigation revealed that it was probably an Atlas missile fired from Vandenburg AFB. The bright light over ocean station November resulted from a flash fire from fuel still left in the b…

PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD

|  1. DATE | 4 August 1965 | 2. LOCATION | Honolulu, Hawaii  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  3. DATE-TIME GROUP | Local | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | ☐ Ground-Visual ☐ Air-Visual ☐ Ground-Radar ☐ Air-Intercept Radar  |
|  5. PHOTOS | ☐ Yes ☑ No | 6. SOURCE | Civilian  |
|  7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | Not Reported | 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | One  |
|  9. SOURCE | Not Reported | 10. OTHER | ☐ A. Insufficient Data for Evaluation ☐ Unknown  |
|  11. COMMENTS | Regarded as non-significant and no investigation made. Insufficient data for evaluation. |  |   |

12. WORKMAN(S)
☐ Was …