be355c4c75b2b231

28978825.pdf

NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-3·pdf·41.6 MB·5 pages

OCR'd text preview (5 of 5 pages)

Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%

page 1
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD

|  1. DATE | 2. LOCATION | 12. CONCLUSIONS  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  7 July 1958 | Uruguay | ☐ Was Balloon ☐ Probably Balloon ☐ Possibly Balloon  |
|  3. DATE-TIME GROUP | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | ☐ Was Aircraft ☐ Probably Aircraft ☐ Possibly Aircraft  |
|  Local 1430,2030 | Ground-Visual ☐ Ground-Rader |   |
|  GMT | Air-Visual ☐ Air-Intercept Rader |   |
|  5. PHOTOS | 6. SOURCE | ☑ Was Astronomical Meteor ☐ Probably Astronomical ☐ Possibly Astronomical  |
|  ☐ Yes ☑ No | CIOVI |   |
|  7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE  |
|  not reported 
page 2
Country: Uruguay
Subject: REPORT OF UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
Source: Uruguayan Air Force
Preparing Officer: Lt Colonel J. Craig Teller

UNCLASSIFIED
MC #: 26706-08
AF #: 1205695
Rpt #: IR-71-58
Agency: OAirA, Montevideo, Uruguay
D.R.: 29 October 1958
D.I.: 7 July 1958
Eval: F-6
Ref: BAIR Reference Unknown

UNCLASSIFIED
4

Set 1/1, Card 1/8
Info Spec: DE/dr
Distr: 4A2a/4B/4B1a/4E4g

Entire Document and Entire English Translation of Incl #1
[See Tech Library for Spanish Language of Incl #1 and
Inclosures 2 through 15]

Attached is a report of the C.I.O.V.I. (Center for Investigating Unidentif
page 3
4

Set 1/1, Card 3/8 Uruguay MC #: 26706-08 Rpt #: IR-71-58

4) That in spite of that, the light that it gave was a bluish white, it did not produce shades and it illuminated the objects at distances of more than 60 kilometers, making all the objects of the same color.

5) That one person who lives in Pan de Azucar reported that the population of the zone could hear on the afternoon of the 7th a sound similar to an explosion. They had commented on this fact, not giving it importance.

6) That to our suggestion to the time in which this sound was heard, this person agreed that it was around 143
page 4
1
4

Set 1/1, Card 5/8 Uruguay MC #: 26706-08
Rpt #: IR-71-58

6) That the luminosity which this object emits has other antecedents in our own country but which is phenomenon difficult to explain due to its peculiar characteristics.

7) That taking into consideration its luminosity and the sound which it sometimes produces, this could be the same one which appeared on the afternoon of the same dry.

8) That the sound as well as something similar to sparks or bubbles which were emitted on certain paths would be phenomenons produced by a special type of propulsion which has not been created by m
page 5
Set 1/1, Card 7/8 Uruguay MC #: 26706-08 Rpt #: IR-71-58

15) That this was the cause for the annulment of the electrical system in Mr. [redacted] car.
NOTE: This is a strong statement to indicate that there were two objects since only in the [redacted] case such an electrical disturbance happened. This did not happen with the passage of the "FOO-FIGHTERS" even if it was flying at a very low altitude.
16) That the physical effects that Mr. [redacted] experienced could have a radioactive origin.
17) That this object was also controlled by an intelligence since it made a maneuver.
18) That the b

Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →