c3092126b4d7aae3

302535961.pdf

NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-5·pdf·23.4 MB·11 pages

OCR'd text preview (8 of 11 pages)

Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%

page 1
|  1. DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION  |
| --- | --- |
|  4 October 64 04/2400 | Cahu, Hawaii  |
|  3. SOURCE | 10. CONCLUSION  |
|  Military | COURTS IN FILM  |
|  4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | Photo analysis indicates that the "objects" are attributable to gouges in the film emulsion which occurred during film processing.  |
|  The |   |
|  5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS  |
|  N/A | Photos showing light spots.  |
|  6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION |   |
|  Not Observed |   |
|  7. COURSE |   |
|  N/A |   |
|  8. PHOTOS |   |
|  ☑ Yes ☐ No |   |
|  9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE |   |
|  ☐ Y
page 2
OFFICIAL FILE COPY

TDEW
Evaluation of Photos, 4 Oct 64
30 Oct 64

PACAFBASECOM (EDI)
APO 953
San Francisco, California

1. Reference your letter, 13 Oct 64, Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) Report.

2. The photographs taken on 4 Oct 64, Naval Dental Clinic, Pearl Harbor Naval Station, Hawaii, have been evaluated. A copy of the photo analysis report, along with the negatives and prints are being returned to your Command.

FOR THE COMMANDER

ERIC T de JONCKHEERE
Colonel, USAF
Deputy for Technology and Subsystems

2 Atchs
1. Photo Analysis
2. Negatives & Prints
page 3
UNCLASSIFIED

PHOTO ANALYSIS REPORT
NR 64-54

PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES
DATE OF REPORT 23 October 1964

SUBJECT: UFO REPORT
LOCATION: Oahu, Hawaii
DATE: 4 October 1964

PHOTOGRAPHY
AF __________ IR __________ QUALITY Good

Two photos lettered A and B and a strip of corresponding negatives. Camera - Kodak
Brownie 127

1. PURPOSE: This report answers WO #64-95 from Major Quintanilla (TDZW), who requested evaluation of photography of possible UFO's taken at Karona Beach Park, Oahu, Hawaii.

2. ANALYSIS: Images on photographs A, B, and negatives are resultant to gouges in the film emulsion. The gouges are
page 4
OFFICIAL FILE COPY

# ENGINEERING SUPPORT WORK REQUEST

☐ ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ☑ PHOTO ANALYSIS ☐ MACHINE COMPUTATION

PPT NUMBER: A68002
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Request evaluation of attached photographs as to most likely cause of image.

REFERENCE MATERIAL: Three negatives, two photographs, letter 13 Oct 64, PACAFSBASECOM (HBI). If duplication is performed, requested we be provided with a copy. Also request that all material be returned upon completion.

REQUESTED BY: HECTOR QUINTANILLA, JR TDEW MRJAT SYMBOL TDEW PHONE 69216

I CERTIFY THAT THIS WORK IS AUTHORIZED BY ME AND THAT IT HAS THE FOLL
page 5
PACIFIC AIR FORCES BASE COMMAND
United States Air Force
APO 963, San Francisco, California

REPLY TO
ATTN OF PACAFBASECOM (BDI) 13 Oct 1964

SUBJECT Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) Report

TO AFSC (FTD)
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio
45433

1. Attached are two (2) Kodacolor prints and negatives showing possible UFO's.

2. The pictures were taken at Kaiona Beach Park which is located just north of the extreme eastern end of the island of Oahu. The reporting party noticed no unusual visual or sound phenomena during the time the pictures were being taken. They were not aware of a possible UFO until 
page 6
a. Description: See photograph. There was no visual sighting or sounds reported at the time the pictures were taken.

b. Description of course of object:
(1) First noticed when pictures were returned from processor.
(2) thru (6) N/A

c. Manner of observation:
(1) Ground photograph.
(2) Kodak Brownie 127 camera.
(3) N/A

d. Time and date:
(1) 04/2400Z - October
(2) Day - 1400 local.

e. Location: 21 19N - 157 40W

f. Identification information on observer:
(2) Military. [redacted] Naval Dental Clinic, Pearl Harbor Naval Station, Hawaii. Reliability considered good.

g. Weather:
(1) N/A
(2) 6,00
page 7
(3) None

(4) 15 miles

(5) Scattered clouds 3,000' and 5,000'.

(6) None

(7) N/A

h. Other unusual activity: None.

i. Intercept action: None.

j. Possible balloon release point: Kaneohe Marine Air Station.

k. Director of Intelligence, PACAFBASECOM/326 ADD. Preliminary analysis: Possible spotting of negative of photograph "B" during manufacture or development of film. Possible spotting of photograph "A" during printing.

l. Physical evidence: Photographs and negatives attached.

6. Request physical evidence be returned after analysis.

FOR THE COMMANDER

JERRY M. MILLS
Captain, USAF
Directo
page 8
OAHU, HAWA II

4 Oct 64 - CASE INCLUDES
three (3) 5'x7" photos

Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →