cea8ab8b29d23ff3
28949194.pdf
NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-2·pdf·45.7 MB·8 pages
Scores
1.1
Document value
0.0
Cross-references
2.0
Provenance
3.1
Info density
0.0
Topic relevance
0.0
Anomalousness
OCR'd text preview (8 of 8 pages)
Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%
page 1
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD | 1. DATE | 2. LOCATION | 3. CONCLUSION | | --- | --- | --- | | 27 Aug 52 | Meridian, Miss. | ☐ Was Balloon ☐ Probably Balloon ☐ Possibly Balloon | | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP Local 2015 CWT. | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ☐ Ground-Visual ☐ Ground-Radar ☑ Air-Visual ☐ Air-Intercept Radar | ☐ Was Aircraft ☐ Probably Aircraft ☐ Possibly Aircraft | | 5. PHOTOS ☐ Yes ☑ No | 6. SOURCE 2 F-51 pilots | ☐ Was Astronomical ☐ Probably Astronomical ☐ Possibly Astronomical | | 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 10 seconds | 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS 1 | 9. COURSE W and N ☐ Other ☐ Insufficient Dat…
page 2
AF FORM 112—PART I APPROVED 1 JUNE 1948 Restricted 12 | COUNTRY | U. S. A. | | --- | --- | | REPORT NO. | DD-99-32 (LEAVE BLANK) | # AIR INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION REPORT ## SUBJECT PULVERTY ## AREA REPORTED ON Meridian, Mississippi ## DATE OF REPORT 2 September 1952 ## DATE OF INFORMATION 27 August 1952 ## ERENSE 1st Lt. Louis F. Buchtold AG 707 645 1st Lt. Robert J. Kries AG 2059796 ## REFERENCE (Check number, number, address, type, etc., as applicable) AF Ltr 200-5 dtd 29 April 1952 ## SUMMARY: (Enter precise summary of report. Give significance in final one-sentence paragraph. L…
page 3
AF FORM 112—PART II APPROVED 1 JUNE 1948 AIR INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION REPORT RECEIVED (CLASSIFICATION) | FROM (Agency) | REPORT NO. | PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES | | --- | --- | --- | | Headquarters, 3615th Plt Tng Wg, Craig AFB, Alabama | IM-59-52 | | STATEMENT The following statement is submitted in accordance with paragraph 7, c, AF letter 200-5 dated 29 April 1952. 1. The object seen was a pale green light resembling the navigational light of an aircraft. Its size was undetermined but it appeared to be 2,000 to 3,000 feet higher than our own aircraft which was at 7,000 feet. There was no so…
page 4
AF FORM 112—PART II APPROVED 1 JUNE 1948 (CLASSIFICATION) AIR INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION REPORT FROM (Agency) Headquarters, 3615th Plt Toq Br, Craig AFB, Alabama REPORT NO. 12-70-52 PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES STATEMENT 1. Following statement is submitted in accordance with paragraph 7, c, A.F. 200-5 dated 29 April 1952. 1. The object 1 sighted was a pale green light of unknown size, somewhat resembling a navigation light of an aircraft. There was no sound or exhaust and the object was traveling at great speed. 2. It was sighted at 2015 on 27 August 1952, for a period not longer than 10 seconds. 3. I…
page 5
F-51
Comparisons to the
DISTRIBUTION
200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
DONE
$$
\frac{28}{60} = \frac{122}{8} \quad 288 = \frac{122}{7120} \quad \frac{2600000}{259} \quad \frac{259}{259} = 2817320
$$
Object good 260 knots to travel 122 N.M. in 28 minutes.page 6
PROJECT 10073 WORKSHEET I. GENERAL | 1. DATE | 2. LOCATION | 3. TIME | | --- | --- | --- | | 27 Nov '52 | Meridian, Miss | Local: 3:41.5 Zebra: 22.15 | 4. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED FROM THE GROUND? ☐ Yes ☐ Naked Eye ☐ Binoculars ☐ Telescope ☐ Theodolite 5. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED BY GROUND RADAR? ☐ Yes ☐ By One Set ☐ By Two Sets ☐ By Three Sets 6. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED FROM THE AIR? ☐ Yes ☑ A/C Observed Object ☐ Interception Attempted ☑ No Intercept Attempted 7. WERE AIRCRAFT SCHAMBLED TO INTERCEPT? ☐ Yes ☑ A/C Scrambled ☐ Visual Contact Made ☐ A/I Contact Made ☐ No Contact Made 8. DID OBJECT C…
page 7
IV. BALLOON DATA 21. WERE BALLOONS RELEASED IN AREA? ☐ Yes ☑ No 22. TIME SINCE SCHEDULED BALLOON RELEASE: __________ Minutes 23. POSSIBLE BALLOON LAUNCH SITES DOWNWIND OF SIGHTING: | | Location | Type | Launching Agency | Lighted? | Describe Lighting | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | a. | | | | Yes | No | | b. | | | | | | | c. | | | | | | | d. | | | | | | (attach overlay) V. EVALUATION 21. EVALUATION OF SOURCE: ☐ Excellent ☐ Good ☐ Fair ☐ Poor ☐ Unreliable ☐ Extremely Doubtful ☐ Hoax 22. DETAILS OF REPORT: ☐ Good ☐ Fair ☐ Poor ☐ Insufficient to Evalu…
page 8
PROJECT 10073 WEATHER DATA SH | 1. DATE OF OBSERVATION | 2. TIME OF OBSERVATION | 3. STATION OBSERVING | | --- | --- | --- | | Obtained from HHS | 10 PM 1-2 | | | 4. WIRDS ALOFT: | ALTITUDE (feet) | VELOCITY (knots) | DIRECTION (degrees) | ALTITUDE (feet) | VELOCITY (knots) | DIRECTION (degrees) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 0 | 2 | 60 | 25,000 | | | | | 1,000 | | | 30,000 | | | | | 2,000 | | | 35,000 | | | | | 3,000 | | | 40,000 | | | | | 4,000 | | | 45,000 | | | | | 5,000 | 2 | 80 | 50,000 | | | | | 6,000 | 14 | 100 | 55,000…
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →