28948830.pdf

PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD

|  1. | 2. LOCATION Mt. View, California | 12. CONCLUSIONS ☐ Has Balloon ☐ Probably Balloon ☐ Possibly Balloon  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  3. | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ☑ Ground-Visual ☐ Ground-Radar ☐ Air-Visual ☐ Air-Intercept Radar | ☐ Has Aircraft ☐ Probably Aircraft ☐ Possibly Aircraft  |
|  4. | 5. SOURCE civilian | ☐ Has Astronomical ☐ Probably Astronomical ☐ Possibly Astronomical  |
|  5. | 6. NUMBER OF OBJECTS 1 | ☐ Other ☐ Insufficient Data for Evaluation ☐ Unknown  |
|  7. BRANCH OF OBSERVATION 5 min. |  |   |
|  8. OTHER SUMMARY OF SIGHTING Silver. Round. Hov…

AF FORM 112—PART I
approved 1 June 1948

|  Country | United States of America  |
| --- | --- |
|  Report No. | (Leave Blank)  |

AIR INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION REPORT

|  Subject | FLEONEET  |
| --- | --- |
|  Area Reported On | Navarro, Minnesota - New Lake Minnesota  |
|  Date of Report | 25 August 1952  |
|  Date of Information | 23 August 1952  |
|  Evaluation | F-4  |
|  Prepared by (Officer) | 2nd Lt. Military Dept. Silver  |
|  Source | — General Minnesota  |

References (Control number, directive, previous report, etc., as applicable)

Summary: (Enter concise summary of report. Give sig…

AF FORM 112---PART II
approved 1 June 1948

AIR INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION REPORT

|  From (Agency) | Report No.  |
| --- | --- |
|  CG, 31st Air Division | Page 1 of 1 Pages  |

The object sighted was spherical in shape.

The size unknown.

The color was silver or aluminum, and it reflected the sunlight.

Only one object was sighted.

The shape of the object did not resemble a plane in any way.

There was no trail or exhaust.

The object was going "Very fast".

The power of the object was unknown.

It did not make any sound.

The object arose from the horizon in the southeast and went north, di…

ACTION COPY
1. Asia
2. Atr
3. C Files

RD25200T
WPH362
YDA367
XYC259
XD3272
JWPML 123
RR JEPHQ JEDWP JEDEN 333
DE JWPML 119A
R 252336Z
FM CG 28TH AIR DIV (DEF) HAFS CALIF
TO JEPHQ/HQS USAF WASHINGTON 25 D C
JEDWP/CG WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB DAYTON OHIO
JEDEN/CG ENT AFB COLORADO SPRINGS COLO
JWPML/CG WADF HAMILTON AFB CALIF
STH OID. 9422 FLYOGRPT. ATTN DIRECTORS OF
INTELLIGENCE AT JEPHQ AND JWPML. ATTN: ATTAA-2C AT JEDWP.

1. ONE ROUND, SILVER COLORRED OBJECT, SIZE OF AIRCRAFT, NO SOUND OR SPEED
REPORTED. OBJECT HOVERED OVER ONE POSITION FOR SHORT TIME. FADED
1 TO DISTAN E.
2. 8933PBT, 24 AUG. 1952…

Page Two JUPHL 52F

5. CLEAR, SLIGHT WIND BLOWING.
7 NONE
8. NONE
9. NONE
10. AIRCRAFT REPORTED IN VICINITY EXACT LOCATION NOT GIVEN.
25/2345Z AUG JMPHL

Cy 1

12

PROJECT 10073 WORKSHEET
I. GENERAL

|  1. DATE | 2. LOCATION | 3. TIME  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  24 Aug '53 | Mt. View, Calif | Local: 0830505 Zebra: 0830  |
|  4. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED FROM THE GROUND? | ☑ Yes ☐ Asked Eye ☐ Binoculars ☐ Telescope ☐ Theodolite | ☐ No  |
|  5. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED BY GROUND RADAR? | ☐ Yes ☐ By One Set ☐ By Two Sets ☐ By Three Sets | ☑ No  |
|  6. WAS OBJECT OBSERVED FROM THE AIR? | ☐ Yes ☐ A/C Observed Object ☐ Interception Attempted ☐ No Intercept Attempted | ☑ No  |
|  7. WERE AIRCRAFT SCRAMBLED TO INTERCEPT? | ☐ Yes ☐ A/C Scrambled ☐ Visual Contact Made ☐ A…

IV. BALLOON DATA

21. WERE BALLDOMS RELEASED IN AREA? ☐ Yes ☐ No
22. TIME SINCE SCHEDULED BALLOON RELEASE: 4/22 Minutes
23. POSSIBLE BALLOON LAUNCH SITES DOWNWIND OF SIGHTING:

|  Location | Type | Launching Agency | Lighted? | Describe Lighting  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  a. |  |  |  |   |
|  b. |  |  |  |   |
|  c. |  |  |  |   |
|  d. |  |  |  |   |

(attach overlay)

V. EVALUATION

21. EVALUATION OF SOURCE:
☐ Excellent
☐ Good
☐ Fair
☐ Poor
☐ Unreliable
☐ Extremely Doubtful
☐ Hoax

22. DETAILS OF REPORT:
☐ Good
☐ Fair
☐ Poor
☐ Insufficient to Evaluate

23. FINAL EVALUATION:
☐ Was …

PROJECT 10073 WEATHER DATA SH

|  1. DATE OF OBSERVATION | 2. TIME OF OBSERVATION | 3. STATION OBSERVING  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  4. WILDS ALOFT:  |   |   |
|  ALTITUDE (feet) | VELOCITY (knots) | DRECTION (degrees)  |
|  0 |  |   |
|  1,000 |  |   |
|  2,000 |  |   |
|  3,000 |  |   |
|  4,000 |  |   |
|  5,000 |  |   |
|  6,000 |  |   |
|  7,000 |  |   |
|  8,000 |  |   |
|  9,000 |  |   |
|  10,000 |  |   |
|  12,000 |  |   |
|  14,000 |  |   |
|  16,000 |  |   |
|  18,000 |  |   |
|  20,000 |  |   |
|  5. WAS AN INVERSION LAYER NOTED? ☐ Yes ☐ No (If yes, at what altitude?)  |   |   |
|  6…