ec180ef41c8bb7a9
302531865.pdf
NARA·NARA_PBB_597821_pdfs-5·pdf·43.4 MB·31 pages
OCR'd text preview (8 of 31 pages)
Source: mistral_ocr · confidence ~95%
page 1
| 1. DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION | | --- | --- | | 21 Mar 64 22/0100Z | Roswell, New Mexico | | 3. SOURCE civilian | 10. CONCLUSION: INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION Photo analysis indicated that the obj reported was not the image on the photo. The image on the photo was probably caused by a chemical drop on the film at some time during its processing. Since the photo did not show an image to compare with the observers descript of the sighting case regarded as Insufficient | | 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS one | 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Bright obj like chrome reflecting sunlight. Time …
page 2
OFFICIAL FILE COPY TDEW UFO Sighting, 21 Mar 64, Roswell, New Mexico 19 Jan 65 Air Force Weapons Laboratory (WLF) Research and Technology Division Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico 1. Evaluation of the photograph taken by Mr [redacted] Drive, Roswell, New Mexico and obtained by Captain Frederic J Kruzel, has been made by the photo analysis branch of this organization. 2. Photo Analysis and Photo Processing personnel viewed the subject film strip and prints with the following results: a. We do not feel that the image is caused by an object observed at the time of photography. b. The im…
page 3
UNCLASSIFIED PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES DATE OF REPORT 22 December 1964 PHOTO ANALYSIS REPORT NR 64-67 SUBJECT UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT LOCATION Roswell, New Mexico DATE Spring 1963 PHOTOGRAPHY AF __________ IR __________ QUALITY __________ P NRS One 35 MM film strip and 4 prints provided by TDEW 1. PURPOSE: This report answers work request #64-82 submitted by Major H. Quintanilla, TDEW/UFO. The request forwarded one 35 MM film strip and four prints for evaluation of image on the film strip and prints. 2. ANALYSIS: Foreign Technology Division Photo Analysis and Photo Processing personnel viewed…
page 4
ENGINEERING SUPPORT WORK REQUEST ☐ ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ☑ PHOTO ANALYSIS ☐ MACHINE COMPUTATION PPT NUMBER: A68002 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: REQUEST EVALUATION OF 35MM SLIDE AS TO MOST LIKELY CAUSE OF IMAGE. REFERENCE MATERIAL: ENLARGEMENTS OF SLIDE AND COMPLETED FTD FORM 164. REQUESTED BY MAJ HECTOR QUINTANILLA, Jr SYMBOL TDEW/UFO PHONE 69216/66378 I CERTIFY THAT THIS WORK IS AUTHORIZED BY ME AND THAT IT HAS THE FOLLOWING PRIORITY AND DEADLINE WITHIN MY DIVISION. NONE PRIORITY 25 Sep 64 DEADLINE DATE SIGNATURE OF APPROVING DIVISION CHIEF 11 Sep 64 DATE ENGINEERING SUPPORT MONITOR ASSISTANT F…
page 5
this case includes Two (2) 8x10 B&W photos Four (4) 1x2 B&W negatives Twelve (12) 4x6 B&W photos
page 6
UNCLASSIFIED PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES DATE OF REPORT 22 December 1964 PHOTO ANALYSIS REPORT NO. 64-67 PROJECT UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT LOCATION Roswell, New Mexico DATE Spring 1963 PHOTOGRAPHY AF __________ IN __________ QUALITY __________ PINO One 35 MM film strip and 4 prints provided by TDEW 1. PURPOSE: This report answers work request #64-82 submitted by Major H. Quintanilla, TDEW/UFO. The request forwarded one 35 MM film strip and four prints for evaluation of image on the film strip and prints. 2. ANALYSIS: Foreign Technology Division Photo Analysis and Photo Processing personnel viewed…
page 7
FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION, AFSC UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
page 8
FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION, AFSC UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
Full text and original imagery available on Internet Archive →