302540722.pdf

|  1. DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION  |
| --- | --- |
|  26 July 1965 27/0229Z | Cumberland, Maryland  |
|  3. SOURCE | 10. CONCLUSION  |
|  Civilian F | Poor Photo Processing  |
|  4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | Visual: INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION  |
|  ONE |   |
|  5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS  |
|  Not Reported | Two negatives and prints were submitted for analysis. Conclusion: F or Photo Processing. No other info given.  |
|  6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION |   |
|  Ground-Visual |   |
|  7. COURSE |   |
|  Not Reported |   |
|  8. PHOTOS |   |
|  ☑ Yes ☐ No |   |
|  9. P…

This case includes one (1) 35"x45" photograph.

DIEFL

TDEW/UFO JAN 11 1966

Photo Analysis Report

Hq USAF SAFOICC (Mrs, Hunt)

We are returning the photographs submitted by Mr. to the United States Air Force for evaluation. The negatives, two prints, and a copy of the photo analysis report are attached. No object can be depicted on the photographs. Since details of the sighting were omitted in Mr. letter, the case is carried in Air Force files as "Insufficient Data."

FOR THE COMMANDER

ERIC T. de JONCKEHERE, Colonel, USAF
Deputy for Technology and Subsystems

3 Atchs
1. Ltr Mr.
2. Photo Analysis Report
3. Two Prints

ORIGINATOR David Lur…

UNCLASSIFIED

PHOTO ANALYSIS REPORT NR 65-60 PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES
DATE OF REPORT 29 DECEMBER 1965

SUBJECT UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT
LOCATION CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND DATE 26 JULY 1965

PHOTOGRAPHY
AF __________ IR __________ QUALITY POOR
P NRS 2-PHOTO PRINTS & NEGATIVES

1. PURPOSE: This is a response to Work Order Number 65-93 submitted by Major H. Quintanilla, Jr., TDEW/UFO, for analysis of attached negatives and prints. The following analysis was conducted by TDDPA (Photo Analysis) and TDDPP (Photo Processing) personnel.

2. ANALYSIS: Close study of the negative indicates poor processing, re…

Dietl 26 July 1969
27/12/292

# ENGINEERING SUPPORT WORK REQUEST

☐ ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ☑ PHOTO ANALYSIS ☐ MACHINE COMPUTATION

PPT NUMBER: A6010301
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Request analysis of the two attached photographs.

REFERENCE MATERIAL: Two photographs, one negative strip and letter from S
Request all reference material be returned upon completion of analysis.

REQUESTED BY: A. Quintanilla, Jr. SYMBOL TDM/IMO PHONE 40216

I CERTIFY THAT THIS WORK IS AUTHORIZED BY ME AND THAT IT HAS THE FOLLOWING PRIORITY AND DEADLINE WITHIN MY DIVISION.

|  PRIORITY | DEADLINE DATE | SIGNATURE OF APPROVIN…

Cumberland, Maryland 21502
July 30, 1965

FAA
Martinsburg Municipal Airport
P. O. Box 1030
Martinsburg, West Virginia

Gentlemen:

I think these two photos of an UFO will be of interest to you since the report went through your facilities. It was taken at 21:29R, on July 26th from my home.

Both photos are over-exposed through my own fault. They were taken at F 3.5, number one exposed about 8 seconds, number two from 3-5 seconds (educated guessing). The UFO appears as a thin, jerky line. The jerkyness was probably caused by nervous hands on the camera.

In photo one, the line seems to separate…

Bedford Rd.
Cumberland, Maryland 21502

F. A. A.
Martinsburg Municipal Airport
P. O. Box 1030
Martinsburg, West Virginia

Cumberland, Maryland 21502
July 29, 1965

U. F. O.
Pentagon Headquarters, U. S. A. F.
Washington, D. C.

Gentlemen:

Enclosed are two photographs of an unidentified flying object which appeared over Cumberland, Maryland, at 01:29Z on July 26, 1965. I will be glad to offer you any information I can about the sighting and the photos.

According to the personnel at Martinsburg Flight Service Station, Martinsburg, West Virginia, the report should have gone through them to Washington Air Route Traffic Control Center and then to the Air Defense Command. I don't know if it has reached you yet, but if…