ev-pbb-0c1531f07e2d

conclusions, OR

· conclusions, OR
Strangeness (S)
0.0
Credibility (P)
4.0
Evidence (EVID)
3.0
Date conf
0.0
Loc conf
2.0

Narrative

AND ANALYSIS ‘ 7. j e ,. » , of ; o ' ‘ « WUiltrse ° Fl Bae £53 & ‘) (eRe ; af | \ 4 : ; ty : ae ' ad = Ld] ’ e = ‘ . - aa . - A, meri 2 a} Pd * é a f . tf = ’ “ 7 r a 4 pt, ) af. a 9 ook od » ails OL NAMe yL 7 * . * . ~~ . ~. ” “* ’ | TYPE OF OBSERVATION OO C : Lt ‘ ; | , L pi id i a 1. . = =- wie > w' - i ww ‘ * ‘ i, , .* or" «# ~~ - _— = @ ¥ heir C. 0 re "AT Oe rs Ae . rom s " | . = 3. Ww ’ de A . : ; - — PS ey) - . . *- = ® ~ | i iJ te ‘ i ett i. ‘ én 5% Peuihe 4 gua L a " ~_« ..2 “7~ P ® . ~ A bad rr , yy * , - * ‘uy ia © > by - I 4 le rigs [| i oe eke f - 4 ' * o * »* ] 7 —- Py , } . > h

extracted via: pbb_case_v1

Source documents (1)

Click filename to view on Internet Archive (where these are mirrored as public-domain US-government records).

Score evidence (5)

Why this event scored the way it did. Every contribution is traceable.

p

  • docs=1 (+0.5)
  • single agency (+0.5)
  • pbb_case_file institutional review (P floor 4)

evid

  • narrative only (base 1)
  • pbb_case_file institutional documentation (EVID floor 3)