ev-pbb-63b6253a80c0

conclusions, OR

· conclusions, OR
Strangeness (S)
0.0
Credibility (P)
4.0
Evidence (EVID)
3.0
Date conf
0.0
Loc conf
2.0

Narrative

= 15 linutes Urls ~4 i? coud it 7. COURSE ‘ Yaried 8. PHOTOS 0 Yes TiiNe 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 0 Yes FI{Ne FORM ) FTD ser 63 0-329 (TOE) Previous editions of this form may be used, ee > | 7 “— o" Ss js, on . ~ * , fa i oa © e « 9 smali rou sharply acfined object treveled first vovrard -— - re i mr 7” 1s eS a By ' ¥ ° ‘r =~" 5 « % » «+ f bess i) ' . “+ _ : a “ — ' F i F rl - — i We «a. iv witeTy UO Wik uel git3 és . , . LOVE Er i° f% ror; ; “=r 7 ’ p = os « _* eva «es # oh. e a. haul ~ ¢, i 7 ‘ 4 ) 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ee ee fe ae ectiy overient. 11 C..Sapocarm, oowint: & cunulous cloudce iony

extracted via: pbb_case_v1

Source documents (1)

Click filename to view on Internet Archive (where these are mirrored as public-domain US-government records).

Score evidence (5)

Why this event scored the way it did. Every contribution is traceable.

p

  • docs=1 (+0.5)
  • single agency (+0.5)
  • pbb_case_file institutional review (P floor 4)

evid

  • narrative only (base 1)
  • pbb_case_file institutional documentation (EVID floor 3)